I was just about embark into unstable testing then, voila, stable release. Awesome.
This is not awesome. This is pointless.
It is pretty much clear that before any intermediate stable release the unstable one needs to be assesed accordingly and it wasn't. For that purpose, providing one single day to do some serious testing, especially to what concerns online racing, is absolutely insufficient.
considering that unstable releases are not announced until they are actually released, furthermore during a week day where usually people have less time it is technically impossible to get any proper feedback. The stable releases are actually being tested for real stability now.
As in previous similar occasions I am sure ISI will react fast and release a new stable build pretty soon.
I don't think the major bug that has struck this unlucky build is something really important. IMO it is just a small bug with a very big impact that probably was difficult to detect througout normal testing. I just hope that this error helps changing something in the testing and bug reporting procedures:
If you look at bug report forum you can see that it is not such an active forum:
- Only 19 threads active in the past 3 weeks.
- The threads are also very small with not many replies to it.
- Only in 3 of this threads have ISI staff posts. One of them is related to last build's MM bug.
I guess this can be improved and some type of sorting should be done. About one post per day does not seem too much.
The prefix in the title that is used in other subforums could be applied by ISI when the thread was read rating its relevance as minor, moderate or major.
For unstable release I already posted about one week being the minimum time for proper testing. I will add here, that I would always release them (unstables) on Friday. If no major bugs are found I would release the stable one the following friday. There, the big test during weekend would happen with plenty of info for ISI to start the week, hopefully minor stuff

. It is clear that the intensity of the testing when a stable build is released is not achievable with a limited betatesters group but hopefully stable build are really stable.
I understand that the same procedure could be applied to the wish list section. I think the difference could be the necessity of filtering those wishes by number of replies which could be an indicator of the people supporting the specific wish. I say so because I think it is a more active subforum where ISI staff might not have time to check everything.
View attachment 11776