Its the RF2 twitter background. For sure its the back section of Lime Rock, but i cant tell if the new chicane is there or not. Also makes perfect sense with the Skip Barber coming
Whatever track it is Tim visited it this year. So my guess is that it would be a current layout. IMO it's not Road Atlanta.
I don't care if it's soon as long as it's pretty Skins are the reason for delay, that's all No one is saying they're main focus of development, but something that ISI wants tested by community now. Except for orange Moon perhaps....
Well that's the internet, one must be careful of what one says, nothing is ever forgotten, database harddrives are (usually) pitiless Lol.
lol... me too... Mind you, I think I`ve done it a few times already. lol... great word ThoKa. That made me lol too... Good stuff guys. Good to get a bit of humour going about.
I would very much appreciate you indicating where: 1: You were told it would last exactly as long as was estimated (take note of that word) and no longer in concrete terms. Or where anything which could mean "more or less" was indicated at any time. 2: Where you have, or anybody has, been told to "p... off" by ISI. 3: Where a thread has been closed purely from criticism. Ever. Thanks.
You're actually missing out the entire context of what I said there. I was replying about someone's driving in a video.
1. while buying in to beta... there was an estimation that it would be 6 months. 6 months was never mentioned? 2. ok, harsh wording maybe but you indicated several times that you would simply not reply to customers request in regards to timing. > (which comes pretty close to p. off.) As I mentioned already, we seem to have a quite different understanding on how to communicate with customers, which lead me to that statement. BUT NO, it was never said literally. 3. Many posts regarding timing ended up in verbal fights and were normally closed by you... (you closed a thread 1 or 2 days ago, because there was apparently a wrong quoatation by me... I could not even reply) > hence this feeling... as I didn't want you to close this thread, I thought it would help- Again and to be very clear: I'm not being personal towards anybody. I just don't agree with the way you communicate during the beta. BUT, it's clear that rF2 is right now already a pretty well advanced SIM and I'm not arguing on the product itself at all! It should however be allowed to express yourself, which you also clearly confirmed in your earlier reply. here the other one: " Originally Posted by Cracheur "The devs are too busy developing" hmmm, if the devs don't have time anymore to think about milestones and a timeline, something must have gone terribly wrong... That's part of the job my eyes. Well, your eyes are seeing something that wasn't said. So nevermind, eh? You even quoted what was actually said, then just took it and made up your own interpretation. Not very sporting." > honestly, if you're following a plan and work with milestones you have a checklist. You only have to publish it... hence it cannot take much time > hence time cannot be the reason for not publishing it > hence the argument of having no time is not valid. that was the reasoning, which lead to the closing > critisism > thread closed... > you anyway made it clear that it a decision by ISI not to publish any info. If you wanted to, you could, without risking additional delays in the final product launch.
"It's definitely not that important in my life" to become frustrated... spending time on something does not necessarely mean that you become frustrated... even though if you have to explain again and again what you write....it can be pretty frustrating
