I tried reducing steering Ratio and I can confirm it helps to recuce wear, on the other side it slows you down also
Why? I do not Need full tire angle in both cases, I roll through a Corner with same tire angle.
All Right you could say full range makes your driving more agressive, faster aprupt directional changes. But lets look at some numbers:
The Radical has 22° max Wheel rot and a Wheel base of ~2710mm, this is a min turning Diameter of 14.5m. Sensitivity (Control angle per Wheel angle 580°/22°) is 25.6
The McLaren has 21° max Wheel rot and a Wheel base of slightly less, only 2670mm, yields at Diameter of 14.9m, very similar. Sensitivity is 26.4, not much different
So if it is the harsh driving due to high steering sensitivity, why is my driving in the McLaren not affected the very same way?
Btw the wheelstand of the radical is very same than for the other gt3, there is no reason that it is much more nervous.
Just to add the Corvette: 12° @ 2713mm, Turn diam 26m (huhh), sensitivity 34,2.
But the Corvette tells us what turn Diameter is needed to race, 26m min turning is enough. So you never exploit the radical range anyway. The Wheel bases are so similiar, the true tire angles are more or less the same if you turn with the car… why the big differences?
Now I made a turn test in Monza with the Radical and McLaren. From the wall on the S/F straight turning left and Looking where you get out on the other side. The concret width is ~19m there. Both cars should turn on the concret. btw. The Corvette crahed into the other wall side, ok 26m turn Diameter..
As you can see the McLaren has a significantly higher turning circle, more likely 21-22m, so the Setup data is wrong or wrong applied.
The radical turns approx how expected with ~15m, still some margin to the end of the concrete line
Last test was to reduce the steering Ratio of the McLaren into the direction of the Corvette. It became nearly undrivable for me, no grip, lot of understeer, slow, very different driving