Can you expand on the goalposts? I'm not aware of that movement. It wouldn't have a timeline either way, although I could understand some of this kind of talk from June onwards.Thanks for the reply, Tim.
And I understand software development enough to know that it's never fully done. Plus, I really appreciate ISI for continuing to support its products well after initial launch. However, it seems like the initial launch of rF2 doesn't have a tentative timeline because the goal posts keep moving. And while long-term betas might work well for some software (Gmail springs to mind), I think the community is growing tired of the nebulous timeline.
Lol.. you were not much generous in the Silverstone teaser picture. Textures look awesome whatsoever.
Content developers make content. Core devs make the core. It doesn't relate. If you're waiting for a core update, ok, but content has nothing to do with that. It's content. Different people, different jobs, different schedules, different work, different testing, different releases.
I am quite generous.Lol.. you were not much generous in the Silverstone teaser picture. Textures look awesome whatsoever.
...You can tell them that, I see no reason to tell them to come back in 5+ years when we've moved on or perhaps rolled back core changes.
As far as licensing, there are some nice possibilities on both the car and track sides. We'll be announcing two exciting high-profile licenses this month (track license acquired last year, car license signed this week). Both these pieces of content will most likely be high in priority for main production focus.
Thanks for the update Tim!
Is the core team working on optimization for AMD cards? Any news from AMD about improving support for rF2 in their drivers?
No, those are not my words. You're reading something which is NOT in MY words.this answer leaves me disappointed...
ISI goals must be make a solid sim... by your words... i can understand that isi have more artists and less people working in the core of the sim....
i know about the idea of develop the core for years... but, we need a solid base... i paid for it one year ago... i don't have right of know what is the real progress???
No, those are not my words. You're reading something which is NOT in MY words.
You weren't, it's fine and unfortunately what I expect. It seems the natural thing when the communication we are asked by the community to make happens, is to talk about what the text doesn't say or mention, rather than what it does.i don't want to be disrespectful, not my intention and sorry if I have been so.
but, like many people here, i don't see progress in important things... that's all...
Well considering this seems to be the first question related to the actual OP content, I'll give you an answer... No, that car does not have a roof.Nice screen of Silverstone there, looking good and thanks for the update Tim. 1 cheeky question though, is the car to be announced a tin top?![]()
Well considering this seems to be the first question related to the actual OP content, I'll give you an answer... No, that car does not have a roof.
Can you expand on the goalposts? I'm not aware of that movement.
I am quite generous.![]()