Latest Release 1109 Rain Effects AND MORE!

I really don't understand why you are denying a proven fact in rF2. Your reviews regarding other Software prove nothing. Ari and others have done several benchmarks with rF2 always with the same result.

 

I think he has not understood, the graphics card 1080 ti does not saturate the 2.0, if it goes wrong with a 1050 ti, besides because rfactor 2 is not well optimized, it is because it is a low-end graphic, not because it does not have 3.0, which was what we talked about in the thread

 

https://forum.studio-397.com/index....017-is-now-available.57398/page-4#post-910133
https://forum.studio-397.com/index....017-is-now-available.57398/page-7#post-910840
https://forum.studio-397.com/index....ng-pci-e-3-0-x16-with-higher-end-cards.45758/

That is the naked truth about rFactor 2, PCIe 2.0 vs PCIe 2.0

 

you have not understood either, I do not deny that 3.0 is 37.5% better, ... If you have a pipeline that allows you to swallow a thousand liters of water and with the best water pump you only have 700 liters, no matter how much the tank is bigger, it will not go faster just 1%

 

if you want, I put the number of threads of reviews on the internet, saying that it is not relevant

Instead of showing me your tests, read the review I showed you

 

It does not mater if you have 1050Ti,1060 or 1080Ti performance lost is -35% when PCIe 2.0 used

 

Which I already covered in my previous post. I'm not denying the problem exists within rFactor 2 and whatever other games aren't well coded in this regard, I'm saying it shouldn't exist.

But what really surprises me is users defending the purchase of a newer motherboard when the problem is with the game, not with the older specification.

 

Sometimes I dont know if some guys are trolling or just being stupid, really. In any case I wish others would stop feeding, it's more than clear they dont get that the problems is in rF2 thus any average internet review is useless. Move on people... put them in your ignore list and be happy.

 

Now you have opportunity to test PCIe 2.0 vs PCIe 3.0 in rFactor 2 with your new hardware, Congratulations btw nice hardware

 

[QUOTE = "Ari Antero, publicación: 929158, miembro: 32581"] No importa si tiene 1050Ti, 1060 o 1080Ti de rendimiento perdido es -35% cuando se utilizó PCIe 2.0 [/ QUOTE]
you are wrong, and I see that you do not want to understand, put the card you put, there is no relevant improvement, or (1050,1060,1070,1080 you) internet is full of reviews that say that, there is no improvement because neither the best card graph saturates the pcie 2.0

 

Come on I have tested also 680, 780Ti and 980Ti, performance lost is -35% no mater which card is used

 

I have a question and it's probably a long shot: have any of you seen a difference in CPU usage between 2.0 and 3.0?

 

yes, there are some trolling here...

 

I must understand that there is a huge language barrier here. Nobody in the forum has ever said that the behaviour is normal. We would all like that the issue didn't exist and that it finally gets sorted. In the meantime, quite long wait BTW, Ari has helped many correctly configuring their PCs.

 

I only have 2.0 to test with but CPU usage has never been an issue on my ancient i5-750. Setting aside the PCI-E issue, which I have already said my opinion on, your GPU is so old that you would benefit from a GPU upgrade regardless of PCI-E version. R9 270X is basically an overclocked AMD HD 7870 which was released in 2012, it is somewhere on the level of a GTX 660/760. With that level of GPU there is no risk of PCI-E limit.

 

for someone who does not read well dir: I said that apart from optimizing rfactor 2, the pcie is not relevant, the internet is full of professionals who say that; for a lot of 1080 card that you put, it does not saturate 2.0, what pcie 3.0 is pure marketing, except if you do crosfire or sli

 

I have 3 PC`s which I have used to gaming, I7 3770k, I7 4770k and I7 6950x.

I7 3770k, PCIe 2.0 x 16


I7 3770k, PCIe 3.0 x16


Edit: Radical GT3 at Nola, 22AI, wether, Overcast & Storm, Green flag

 

I do not say that it does not help, or that it does something bad, I only say that seen the seen in this subject, it is wrong, the reviews by professionals show it, there is more, but whoever wants to ask the google uncle, and he will see it,

I am not the one who says that, I only share what was not said here, ... it was said that 3.0 was better than 2.0, and I affirm that it is better, but not relevant with 1 single graphic card, for example a 1080ti, if such a powerful graph does not saturate, the other lower ones saturate less

 

I do recall seeing someone saying it's normal, but I could be wrong as well.

What I personally advocate for is that we shouldn't suggest users to get new computer parts just because of a problematic game engine. Instead, we should be as vocal to the developers as we can be and demand an answer and fix for the problem.

I don't know about other users, but I'm voting with my wallet. I didn't mind rF2 performance too much in the past, but since this new update I'm very disappointed with it and made clear I won't be supporting S397 anymore.

If S397 make good performance improvements then I'll definitely keep throwing money at them again. But it makes zero sense to buy new computer parts just because rF2 isn't well coded. It makes much more sense to just buy other games that run and look better.

 

@Amarildo Junior you have to give time to the updates, when dx11 beta was horrible and improved, you have to give time to continue improving the problems that arise , what to continue supporting or not, it is clear that it is personal, in the graphic a 1050ti seems too low to play, much less to simulate, many physical data, not only are graphics, are mathematical calculations