rf2 graphics quality expectations

Thanks for lighting me AC will not be 4,99 euros ???? Damn !!!!
IT's obvious that AC will be around the same price than RF2 !!!! i'm not a dumda.... but i know that compare to RF2 (For the moment) i'll have a game with good physics and excellent graphic.. witch is not for the moment the case of RF2. When (and i hope it will be soon) RF2 will have improved the graphics, i'll be very happy to have paid around 64 euros....for the moment i'm disappointed...
Regards.

 

Thank you 1959NIKOS, but i don't care about the comments of this guy. like i already told him insulting happens when your out of arguments....

 

How these two pictures are comparable?

Besides I did not say that AC do not look better, I only said that rf2 do not look as bad as you posted.

 

Ok thanks, didn't know (or think of) that.

 

Could you just be trying for just a second to say something constructive with arguments ??

 

So it must be a problem with my english understanding !!! My fault !!

 

I wanted to compare your picture quite Full in terms of CG, with a "standard" pict from AC that's all...
I agree with you and i didn't say that you say AC did not look better.
regards.

 

Then I wonder why ISI don't use this, especially if it saves vram usage

 

Because the vram usage is not something more important than the drawcall quantity.

More shader/material (not textures) you're using, more drawcalls you're making. This is the very basic rule of atlassing.

 

I do not see the point of repeating what has been said in this thread multiple times. You clearly havent read the whole thread, and come here with arguements, not only why AC in your opinnion is better "sim" than rF2, but insist repeating yourself with feeble attempts to provide proof, just because you tried a tech demo.
Do you work for Kunos or are you just selling their product out of mere personal pleasure?

I find that rediculous and totally ignorant attitude towards what simulators are all about.
I do not like people like you who value graphics over physics, because they go and buy the arcade candy games and kill the simulator industry. Because they yell and scream till they turn every single good sim into Dirt (both, the game series by CM and the stuff on the ground). Because just believing what they believe is not good enough for them, everyone needs to see and feel the same, or they are not happy.
Its one thing to call someone unintelligent or their opinnion unsmart because they clearly dont have all the oars in the boat, and totally other to try to make everyone match the IQ and opinnion of one individual by resorting to fantasy, which to be honest is like trying to juggle with moose testicles, while driving a car, from the roof of the car, in the winter, naked, while wrestling a rabid bear... its all going to go wrong at some point.

If its pretty that you want, fine. I play games that are pretty too, nothing wrong with that, but since you lack the constitutive idealistic difference between a simulator and a game (rF2=Racing sim, GT5=Driving game), theres nothing your kind can bring to the table that makes one iota difference to the things that really matter in a simulator.
The realistic experience of racing.

So No, I cannot try for one second to say anything constructive about the arguements you have made.

 

*ouch*

 

Finally glad to read something from you without any insult....thanks for that.
It really seems that you didn't read a word i'm saying, you say i'm ignorant at what simulator are, and you presume that AC is an arcade game, but when you say Richard burns Rally 2013 is the greatest sim i'm wondering if you do know what simulator is all about. It seems obvious that you didn't try the Tech preview and if you had any experience in simracing you would have knew that Kuno had to developed a game called Netkar pro witch from on the opinion of simrace mag like "inside simracing", is one of the reference, if you do love simrace like you seems to say you would surely have asked yourself why a society like EVOTEK has developed the Evotek SYM 026 with the Assetto corsa software. i do not work for Kuno and i'm not a fanboy of this or this game, i just assume comparing games that tend to be sell on the simrace market in 2013 with the computers technology that can be used from 2013.
Last but not least i've never said that I value graphics over physics, all i've said along this thread is that ISI should pay more attention to graphics cause if they do RF2 will surely be THE GREATEST sim ever.

 

You boys want to take this to PM? It's all a bit one on one, and not really adding much to the thread.

 

You are welcome.

No I do not.

Thats just one of those statements that Tim indirectly has asked me to ignore. *ignoring*

I have the tech demo and Nkpro, I dont have a wheel atm since its dead, and so I have not driven the tech demo yet, so I do not make assumptions of the physics of it and least of all what the complete product will be like.
I do not ask questions from myself when I cant be bothered to care about the answer.
Kunos is great, and most likely AC will be too, never said otherwise.

Only thing I can completely agree with you is something that has to be taken out of context, which is interesting.

 

Yeah, no need I'm done anyways. Sorry about that.

 

thanks for taking time to answer....sad to read your wheel is dead ...
regards.

 

a one on one.....didn't knew we were talking about Basketball !!! LOL !!!

 

There is definitely a lot of work left to do to tweak the HDR/lighting. At the moment Poznan looks like a completely different circuit when driven from the bumper cam than from the cockpit. The HDR makes the world look way overbright inside all closed wheel cockpits. It's really not some DX9/DX11 issue or even something that couldn't be fixed by ISI I believe, so I wouldn't be too worried.

 

Try this.
http://isiforums.net/f/showthread.php/10781-Poznan-HDR-profile?p=147787#post147787