Patrick Schumacher
Registered
Whereby the raw data (laser scan) only is the half of the job. Significant is also how to rebuild it I think.
Take a look at PC2 and the green hell. SMS had laser scan data as a basis but how looks the track? Pretty bad and the worst among the versions of all sim-racers (also GTS). Surface, curbs, topographie are not really accurate.
There are also differences in the NOS among iRacing, AC, RR. All three are doing a good job, but iRacing is the most impressive and accurate. They engineered the curbs, surface, the terrain, the whole scale simply better.
I really hope we will get more tracks in Sebring quality for rF2. It's such a good feeling to drive and a lot of fun.
Take a look at PC2 and the green hell. SMS had laser scan data as a basis but how looks the track? Pretty bad and the worst among the versions of all sim-racers (also GTS). Surface, curbs, topographie are not really accurate.
There are also differences in the NOS among iRacing, AC, RR. All three are doing a good job, but iRacing is the most impressive and accurate. They engineered the curbs, surface, the terrain, the whole scale simply better.
I really hope we will get more tracks in Sebring quality for rF2. It's such a good feeling to drive and a lot of fun.