You think totally, but then totally different from me on this point. But I fully respect your point of view, which is not mine. Each user is different, and these needs are different. I'm really focused on realism : DX9 graphics totally in ultra with AA at most suited me perfectly (really). Suddenly, the improvement of realism (not only physics, realroad, laser, wet road and aquaplanning, etc etc etc) is for me, simply the reason for being RF2 (for me). On the other hand, the GPU + CPU performance is an extremely high priority too : 1. S397 must not leave aside some of these users. It would be really not normal and not correct. 2. Then everyone will understand that the very low latency + the perfect fluidity + the absence of stuttering + the absence of lags ................................... is just 1 billion times more important that the beautiful graphics, because we are not in a video game itself, but a real hardcore simulation, which I think targets the driving enthusiasts (who privilege realism) and not the players of video games (which privilege immersion, ergonomics, visual etc. and generally choose PC2 / AC / Raceroom). I let you think about what developments are very widely favored since the arrival of S397 : For these two reasons that I prefer (realism + performance), I am extremely frustrated. We are all different / we all have different expectations : That's why some of the users of RF2 are delighted with the developments made or planned by S397.....................for another part (less numerous apparently), there are a lot of frustrations and deceptions.