I'm fat. Time to get realistic.

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Kknorpp001, Dec 15, 2012.

  1. KeiKei

    KeiKei Registered

    Joined:
    May 24, 2012
    Messages:
    806
    Likes Received:
    44
    You should never give mass away because more mass means more force! It's just basic physics: m * a = F

    For example:

    60 kg * 9,81 m/s^2 = 589 N
    100 kg * 9,81 m/s^2 = 981 N

    So increasing mass by 40 kg you gain force by almost 400 Newtons!
     
  2. jtbo

    jtbo Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,668
    Likes Received:
    48
    Yes, it is very good for ramming things :)
     
  3. BigDuke6

    BigDuke6 Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    73
    Sounds like a job for the "Infinite Improbability Drive" to me.
    #42 Skippy all the way. :p
     
  4. osella

    osella Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    26
    A thread about overweight turns into a physics class. Honestly did not expect that.

    Thank god I'm 192 tall and weigh 110kg so I'm fine :D:D

    I don't look fat at least in my opinion (you know how it is when a female looks into a mirror she always thinks she's fat, males usually think they're muscular).
    Basically I have body similar to Timo Salonen, what a ridiculously cool guy btw. He's always been overweight, heavy smoker, heavy glasses with a habit of steering group B cars onehanded for whole special stages lol. A bit shame he got overshadowed by other legends of that era.
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Golanv

    Golanv Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    Messages:
    1,041
    Likes Received:
    9
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timo_Salonen

    "He was also known for his relaxed attitude and for his habit of steering his rally car with one hand only. These factors led to the nickname Löysä ("Slack")." :p

    Great driver.
     
  6. kaptainkremmen

    kaptainkremmen Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    935
    Likes Received:
    17
    lol. So long.....and thanks for all the fish. :)
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. Deadpedal

    Deadpedal Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2011
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    6
    Redundant. I swear that rF1 AND rF2 already know my weight. How else could my slowness be explained? :p
     
  8. blakboks

    blakboks Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    843
    Likes Received:
    30
    Don't forget that we should also have sim rig parc ferme from qualy onward. And our rigs are subject to random scrutineering--which need to meet a minimum weight (driver included) as well. Or maybe, more appropriate for sim-racing, that our power consumption needs to be below a certain amount--1000W for top-tier, 650 for mid-tier racing, and 400 for semi-pro racing.
     
  9. Prodigy

    Prodigy Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2012
    Messages:
    949
    Likes Received:
    64
    There should be an Humor section in this forum.
     
  10. ZeosPantera

    ZeosPantera Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,397
    Likes Received:
    14
    My biggest concern with my weight is I want to build a motion cockpit one day. (not a baby shaker rig) and that means I would need to make it BUFF to fling me around with ease. Also racing chairs hurt my bottom.
     
  11. Nimugp

    Nimugp Registered

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    140
    This thread really dissapoints me very very bad :(


















    Where is the poll Kknorpp001????? :p ;)
     
  12. Pits

    Pits Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    5
    Put a corner into the equation and see what effects that brings on, you'll get a little bit more tire wear at 186K MPS.
     
  13. Nand Gate

    Nand Gate Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Messages:
    471
    Likes Received:
    12
    It is one of the most basic principles of physics that mass increases with speed.
     
  14. Gearjammer

    Gearjammer Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    24
    I am no physicist so I will ask the dumb question. How does mass increase with speed? I always thought that mass was constant.
     
  15. gorgias1976

    gorgias1976 Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    83
    It comes from Einstein's relativity theory and Lorentz's formulas.... but at our racing speeds mass increase would be ridiculous.

    [​IMG]
     
  16. Pits

    Pits Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    5
    Mass is constant at zero movement, it's when you shake your finger at another driver you can shift the whole universe, beit very slightly. I read something very uninteresting last week, the light that hits New York pushes at a force of 230lbs total, to be crushed by light, hmmm
     
  17. Gearjammer

    Gearjammer Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    24
    Hmmm, just being devil's advocate, but would the car's mass be more if it travels in the same direction as the rotation of the Earth as opposed to against it given the same speed being achieved?
     
  18. blakboks

    blakboks Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    843
    Likes Received:
    30
    Yes, they will have different mass, because physics deals with velocity, which has a direction and a magnitude. Speed is just the magnitude component of velocity. Therefore, according to the equation above, because the velocities are different (i.e. they're moving in different directions), they will have different mass. But, like we've discussed, it'd be so insignificant, that they are essentially the same mass for all intents and purposes.
     
  19. osella

    osella Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    26
    If I calculated roughly well, even at 360kph mass increases by 1,00000000000000005%. I probably missed it by an order or two though since I rarely count something myself.

    Interesting is even at 10% of speed of light (which would be pretty fast.. actually 3000x faster than fastest current spacecraft propulsion technologies ) it's an increase of only 0.5%.
     
  20. SLuisHamilton

    SLuisHamilton Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2012
    Messages:
    860
    Likes Received:
    20
    I just need to know that offline i have classical mechanics working and online quantum mechanics
     

Share This Page