Will this processor run rF2 better?

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by ccjcc81, Jul 22, 2013.

  1. CosmiC10R

    CosmiC10R Registered

    Joined:
    May 8, 2013
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    0
    What Fps are you getting with that setup if I might ask? Shame the OC is not helping the low fps sections ...
    I still think a strong cpu is a plus for games that are doing a lot of physics and simulation type calculations, less so for the CODs of the world and that is where the overall system performance might be a bigger aspect to "sim" games.

    Nice work sticking with it Ricknau. I haven't touched mine since my last 3 day restoration... lol
     
  2. Natureboy

    Natureboy Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2013
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok, did lots of testing today out of curiosity. Here are some test results that link back to this thread: http://isiforums.net/f/showthread.p...ected-Need-help-from-680-770-780-Titan-owners

    For me OC on a 3570k in this game makes no difference in general, track to track its a bit different, but who cares; even at 45FPS its very smooth and there is no indication of input lag.

    Tests:
    1. Megane at Mills Outer Loop C - with 24AI
    2. Megane at Mills Outer Loop C - no AI
    3. Modern F2 at Silverstone - no AI

    Results:
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H
    i5 3570k@4.4GHz
    16GB hyper-x red @ 1600MHz
    EVGA GTX770SC with ACX cooler at 1189MHz

    1920x1080 Everything on and max with 6xAA

    Test 1
    Avg: 61.266 - Min: 48 - Max: 77
    Test 2
    Avg: 92.071 - Min: 71 - Max: 116
    Test 3
    Avg: 88.775 - Min: 73 - Max: 106

    2560x1440 Everything on and max with 3xAA

    Test 1
    Avg: 54.642 - Min: 42 - Max: 67
    Test 2
    Avg: 80.468 - Min: 64 - Max: 99
    Test 3
    Avg: 78.339 - Min: 67 - Max: 91



    i5 3570k@3.4GHz, 3.8GHz turbo
    16GB hyper-x red @ 1600MHz
    EVGA GTX770SC with ACX cooler at 1189MHz

    1920x1080 Everything on and max with 6xAA

    Test 1
    Avg: 56.498 - Min: 45 - Max: 75
    Test 2
    Avg: 94.318 - Min: 73 - Max: 119
    Test 3
    Avg: 90.340 - Min: 74 - Max: 113

    2560x1440 Everything on and max with 3xAA

    Test 1
    Avg: 50.779 - Min: 40 - Max: 62
    Test 2
    Avg: 80.653 - Min: 64 - Max: 99
    Test 3
    Avg: 76.354 - Min: 62 - Max: 90
     
  3. CosmiC10R

    CosmiC10R Registered

    Joined:
    May 8, 2013
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    0
    Great test... Thanks for posting that... very interesting!
    I'm surprised the OC had such a minimal adjustment. I have a busy few days but I would like to do a similar test on my pc... Ill post it if I get a chance
     
  4. DurgeDriven

    DurgeDriven Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,320
    Likes Received:
    43
    Now run tests low quality low resolution

    It will make everything that much clearer. LOPL


    How do you get more fps at a lower clock speed in Test 2 ?



    Exactly what I said about low res tests. ? lol
     
  5. Natureboy

    Natureboy Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2013
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Probably the 3570k is fast enough at stock speed to not limit FPS in any way. It's barely used to run the game, so a faster clock should make no difference. From reviews its roughly 10% faster than the 2500k at a given clock, so ~4.18 GHz. I am surprised at just how much you overclock helps, if you have lowered some graphics settings maybe thats why??? Or you just have your system running great, and I am then probably missing something else to unlock more FPS with the OC.

    By the way, CPU runs at ~53/63 deg for stock/OC (1.26V) settings with a basic H70 watercooler. 770 runs at 50 deg, 1189MHz at all times, and power consumption of only 63%. I have briefly tried to OC the 770 further with the EVGA utility, but on 3 tries to bump over 1200MHz and a high power target it ran with lower power use???
     
  6. Ricknau

    Ricknau Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    39
    I went ahead and bought a new cooler, Xigmatek Gaia model. Very impressive cooling for sub $25! Dropped my temps from 80s (only hit that momentarily) to mid 60s. Did a bios overclock like DD suggested. Runs well and cool at 4.3GHz, up from 3.6GHz. Not too interested in eeking out another 0.2GHz, especially since it gained me nothing in FPS. I was surprised. But then I OC'd my MSI GTX560-448. It's a "twin frozr III" which I presume means it can really stay cool with stock dual fans. Used Afterburner to bump it up to 925Mhz (25% increase) for the core clock and 2150MHz (10% increase) on the mem clock. Man, that made a difference! That gave me roughly a 15-20% increase in FPS. Suweeet! With fan setting I've chosen the GPU never goes above 72C. I guess now I'll hold off on a new card purchase and see how things unfold in the rF2 graphics development saga.

    Edit: some of my cooling gains can probably be attributed to applying new heat sink compound. The old stuff was dry and caked. Are you supposed to renew that stuff every so often?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 4, 2013
  7. Gearjammer

    Gearjammer Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    24
    It is not a bad idea to have a look at the heat transfer compound everyone once in a while Ricknau. I generally look at mine about once every 3 to 4 months to be sure it all still looks good.
     
  8. DurgeDriven

    DurgeDriven Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,320
    Likes Received:
    43

    Yes most of the thermal paste comes with cheaper HS/F is pretty average.

    Get a tube of AS5 and some cleaner.

    http://www.arcticsilver.com/as5.htm
    http://www.arcticsilver.com/arcticlean.htm

    It can be worth 1-5 degrees over average TM.

    It also helps heat transfer so your processor cools faster.


    Poor paste job can cost you 10C or more.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 5, 2013
  9. DrR1pper

    DrR1pper Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2012
    Messages:
    3,294
    Likes Received:
    36
    Are you talking about under the metal cover of the cpu itself?
     
  10. DurgeDriven

    DurgeDriven Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,320
    Likes Received:
    43
    Say what !!! :eek:



    This is roughly the idea..........


    Crap video sry.


    BTW

    TIP


    I don't use thin glove material like that ughh
    I find it uneven and porous and why wreck a pair of gloves

    Better is just a piece of a really thin plastic bag like you get fresh food / fruit in.

    NOT a NORMAL SHOPPING BAG the really thin transparent ones only use.

    I wrap that around my finger and wind it up to tighten it, it is very stiff and smooth and harder then glove materials.



    ;)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 5, 2013
  11. DrR1pper

    DrR1pper Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2012
    Messages:
    3,294
    Likes Received:
    36
    this is what i thought you meant...

     
  12. Gearjammer

    Gearjammer Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    24
    Seems everyone has their own ideas on how to apply TM. I have read that you really don't even need to spread it around a lot. Just put a drop about half the size of a normal pea on the CPU and put the heat sink on. The pressure should spread it around plenty. One thing that I have seen is test results that show that too much is just as bad as not enough TM. So use it sparingly. :)
     
  13. DurgeDriven

    DurgeDriven Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,320
    Likes Received:
    43
    Yeah less you use the better you want it translucent.

    I always spread it
     
  14. Jamezinho

    Jamezinho Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's how I applied mine and my temps have always been good. No need to spread the TIM.
     
  15. DurgeDriven

    DurgeDriven Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,320
    Likes Received:
    43

    As long as people understand there is no need not to spread it either.

    I have fitted 100s of CPU both ways.

    It is down to your experience.

    Applying translucent I get just the right amount every time.

    Squeezing can causes problems depending on coolers with uneven surfaces or application.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 6, 2013
  16. DurgeDriven

    DurgeDriven Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,320
    Likes Received:
    43
    Did you see how after seating the paste he slips ? lol

    That is what can cause most problems no matter which way you do it.
    Novices can easily slip sideways worse then that and have uneven paste or air pockets.
    You can even scratch processor surface with a botched install, not too hard to do.

    You really should not go touching IHS surface with your fingerprints either, esp dirty fingers like that !

    The reason a lot of cooler makers including Corsair liquid, Intel and AMD give you perfectly spread TM
    is it is lab tested as the best way for Joe Smith to get fair-good result.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 6, 2013

Share This Page