So you’re happy to hold s397 to the same standard of isi,this software under the previous leadership left a lotto people with a sour taste in their mouths,not holding s397 to a higher standard is part of the problem,and we will be partly to blame if rf2 finally dies a slow death because the general consensus of the product as a whole didn’t change within the community,and therefore didn’t really increase its memebrsbase to any significant degree. It’s no about entitlement,it’s about having standards on par or better than the competition. THATS HOW YOU COMPETE Also this bug I was on about shouldn’t have slipped through as it’s not an obscure one,plus the mirrors and other things. It was either rushed for the release because of lemans,or they don’t have enough testers. It’s fine if your happy with content being released with visual bugs,but there are 100s if not 1000s out there that will disagree,again rf2 if we take physics,tyre model and fun out of the equation,has a bad rep,that needs to change if it wants a long future. that’s one thing about iracing I do actually like,you know 9/10 what they release content wise is solid as a rock visually,I can’t remember a car being released of the few yes I was there that had any visual problems or problems with mirrors etc. It’s not entitlement to want rf2 to at least match that,it’s called being competitive Look this is not me thinking of myself and my purchase,I love rf2,graphics don’t do it for me in any game,I’m all about how it’s feels,physics etc,and rf2 is king in this aspect for now. My opinions point towards the people who have had a sour taste in their mouths from the experience as a whole that rf2 gave them over the previous years. It’s those people s397 need to impress,not me or you.