Does anyone else think like this?

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Kknorpp001, May 20, 2013.

  1. Kknorpp001

    Kknorpp001 Banned

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,928
    Likes Received:
    21
  2. TIG_green

    TIG_green Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,038
    Likes Received:
    44
    What is that? :D otherwise hard to think alike :p
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 20, 2013
  3. Kknorpp001

    Kknorpp001 Banned

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,928
    Likes Received:
    21
    For me it is a measure of how twisty the track is. For example, I only drive Clio and SB on twister tracks and 60s F1 on less twisty tracks. For me personally, straights are only means to gain speed for high-speed turns. My least favorite courses are those which have long straights followed by sharp turn. Maybe I should also add a column for brake life per mile index :p.
     
  4. jpalesi

    jpalesi Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    366
    Likes Received:
    231
    If I get it right, you discovered the formula which tells scientifically that Monaco is a twisty track and Spa is fast with long straights ? Congratulations !
     
  5. Jim Beam

    Jim Beam Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    824
    Likes Received:
    10
  6. Spinelli

    Spinelli Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    5,290
    Likes Received:
    32
    My opinion...

    I drive most cars on most tracks, a Clio at Monza has it's own unique challenges, just like an F1 at Toban-Short has.

    Every track/track configuration combined with every car/car configuration, is it's own unique experience and challenge.
     
  7. Gearjammer

    Gearjammer Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2012
    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    24
    Amen Spinelli, totally agree with that assessment. :)
     

Share This Page