Community Screenshots Thread (Unedited Screens Only)

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by 88mphTim, Oct 21, 2013.

  1. Eddy

    Eddy Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    394
    +1 the exhaust flames......WOW
     
  2. hexagramme

    hexagramme Registered

    Joined:
    May 25, 2013
    Messages:
    4,245
    Likes Received:
    194
    Hehe.. People taking about rF2 having bad, dated graphics..? Take a pill or something. :)
     
  3. MikeeCZ

    MikeeCZ Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    180
    that is because people keep looking at modders stuff, and just the ones that were made by 10 year olds in Microsoft Painting
     
  4. hexagramme

    hexagramme Registered

    Joined:
    May 25, 2013
    Messages:
    4,245
    Likes Received:
    194
    This is a very beautiful skin. Good work mate.
    Keep fighting M...
     
  5. Capeta

    Capeta Registered

    Joined:
    May 31, 2012
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    48
    Very nice Robert, good to see it. :)
     
  6. peterchen

    peterchen Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,099
    Likes Received:
    287
    Yeah! Just purchased rF2 after 3 Demos and it looks DAMN GOOD on a 550TI with 2500K, 32Bit Win XP at 1440p!!
    Just to go through this tweaking-"hell".

    Friend of mine just had a 780 GTX and all maxed out with AA6x or something: 120 frames average (Demo)!
    I must say that the demo runs smoother and had more fps than the "end product";
    maybe because of the mod....but I can´t believe that the C6R have less polys than the clio.....

    After all:
    I have only one idea what the problem could be with some users that are complaining about
    performance or graphics:
    they are not able to tweak!
    And that is something that should be solved by ISI, by adding an own benchmark for example.

    By the way: Great shots here!!! Keep it on!

    Greets
    Pete
     
  7. MikeeCZ

    MikeeCZ Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    180
    Isnt the demo track Mores? that is very small track with not too many objects, so performance is probably better on such than on other bigger tracks
     
  8. ForthRight

    ForthRight Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    4
    The skin looks great, and I certainly echo the sentiment.
     
  9. FONismo

    FONismo Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,100
    Likes Received:
    54
    Sorry but that F2 in your pics looks terrible on my screen, graphics do indeed look dated, not sure how anyone could confuse or pretend to confuse them screens with pCARS or any other recent sim. rF2 is getting there slowly, new HDR is looking nice at times but sorry the shaders etc on that car look bad. Car looks low res as hell aswell.
     
  10. hexagramme

    hexagramme Registered

    Joined:
    May 25, 2013
    Messages:
    4,245
    Likes Received:
    194
    Thanks mate.

    I think you're right. Not being able to tweak or not having a good enough systemt to run it are the usual problems.

    pCARS doesn't interest me one bit. Neither do the glossy "show boating" über post-processed pCARS screens. Know why? Because the two titles don't really compare, imo.
    I'm all for content over looks. I'm not saying you're wrong. I just see it in another way. rF2 is beautiful imo.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 1, 2014
  11. FONismo

    FONismo Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,100
    Likes Received:
    54
    Funny thing is i don't like pCARS or am i saying that rF2 is not beautiful but these shots in question do look dated. And as much as you don't like uber glossy graphics, you can not honestly say you wouldn't want pCARS level models and shaders in rF2. The F2 in your screens along with that track look very dated.
     
  12. hexagramme

    hexagramme Registered

    Joined:
    May 25, 2013
    Messages:
    4,245
    Likes Received:
    194
    Yes I can honestly say so. It would take resources away from the physics and probably dumb things down. So no, I wouldn't want that. Not at all.
     
  13. Robert Gödicke

    Robert Gödicke Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    409
    Likes Received:
    11
    #KeepFightingMichael

    I gotta say I <3 the new automation HDR.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  14. GTClub_wajdi

    GTClub_wajdi Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    3,239
    Likes Received:
    572
    Agree with you FONism, the main problem of rf2 is the outdated shaders! I wish ISI can improve them...
     
  15. peterchen

    peterchen Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,099
    Likes Received:
    287
    I can´t see anything dated here...it´s present tense :p
     
  16. quantiz

    quantiz Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
  17. Sderenno

    Sderenno Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    113
  18. formula1996

    formula1996 Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2012
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    1
  19. MikeeCZ

    MikeeCZ Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    180

    im gonna ask streight away, so i know If I am interested in this or not - is it your own model or is it rip off? If its your own, than i cant wait :)
     
  20. GTClub_wajdi

    GTClub_wajdi Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    3,239
    Likes Received:
    572

Share This Page