Lets put together Q&A to developers

Why not but it might be an idea that someone creates a summary structured document.( grouping by gfx, physics, new features etc....)????

 

Q&A Dev -

Given the professional quality of ISI developed licensed content and the realism that brings to your product, is the time and effort invested to support open modding in rF2 still considered a worthwhile endeavor?

 

Are we gonna get the shorter club track for Mills eventually? bugs me that it's there and unusable!

 

To me one of the biggest issues with RF2 is graphics, especially cars.

Is ISI working on cars to make them look more realistic?
How much priority do you give development of looks and eye candy?

5.1 sound is not working yet. Are you going to fix it in a not to far future?

 

I've see this user comment in a another thread,

ISI what is your internal talks about DX11 in the future ? Is the move to DX11 much to complex ? Let us talk more about the technics and the background about this theme.

 

6.Has hiring the new staff helped get things back on track ?

 

Another topic i hope you will attend is weather.

Having changeable weather would be great. I wonder if you're working on it?

Fixing the spray in the rain would be great. To be honest it looks totally horrible.

 

Any last questions? I'll compile these and send them to Tim in a couple of days.

 

Thanks Adrian for compiling

Few questions:

-Any plans to improve lobby view? I would like to see server settings before I enter the server.

- Will ISI host a server(s) in the future?

- Is there any work done with some kind of a realistic clutch simulation atm?

 

Will multiple refuel/pitstop positions per car allowed in future? What I mean is Baja offroad style stops where you race from point2point and can have several places for pitstop.

 

Is a real 4 core support (quad core) planned? Currently rF2 can use 2 cores.

 

Really?? Are u sure? That might explain why the game is so heavy to run.

 

@ Adrian make a post that the list is done..... all ?'s after that will have to go to the next 1 if Tim gives the ok for another in about 6 months.

 

+1

 

My i5 2500k processor usage look like this while playing rF2:

Core "0" = 60-75%
Core "1" = 10-20%
Core "2" = 10-20%
Core "3" = 50-60%

So, yes I guess rF2 use only 2 cores.

I'd like to ask if we will see any 'big' improvements in performance in the future?
Now when we have triple screen support I'd like to use it, but it's barely playable with one radeon 7970 and medium graphic settings. Adding a second 7970 only results in better fps in some situations, but mostly it's lower than running single gpu. "Multi-view" also adds massive screen tearing for me, and together with mirrors it's the worst fps-eater.

 

Soft body physics,suspension animation? (No more flying pleeease!)
I would also ask if we are going to get Iracing style level of view/screen controls?
Most importantly,I would like to know if 64bit support is ever likely to happen?

 

I've disabled 2 cores and i test my fps in game -->exactly the same fps = rF2 no 4 core support
But i think all the goodies coming soon, i trust ISI

 

lol, I've been scratching my head over this as well. It would be a cool little layout and I cant for the life of me understand why it isnt active.

 

I would try to target this for the end of June, guys.

 

You're always so cryptic. Do you mean the QA or mills short or cpu usage (or yellow lights haha)?