Community Screenshots Thread (Unedited Screens Only)

... click

 

Remik and Hexagramme dominating this thread the last couple pages, especially the black proto, Indycars, and 90's Mac, wow!

 

It's overused as exclamation, but Hexa... Those are photorealistic. Simple send the next guy who starts a gfx discussion to this page.

 

Omg!!!111

 

Wow hex amazing

 

Yeah, rFactor2 really is graphically inferior, isn't it..?

 

deleted - Google+ messed up the links

 

McLaren pictures are really good but they're miles and miles away of photorealism. They show a acceptable quality for 2015. Liked!

BUT... the old F1's car posted above are really terrible. Just look those oversaturated colours, awful textures in the environment, random colours reflections, low poly models, over stretched textures lying on the polys, horrible sprites as the spectators, wrong face normals and smoothing method (look at that park bench - lol) and, for the god sake, they should put some modern helmet covering the driver's head, this plastic dummie is so silly. You must be very biased or maybe blind to considered it as "photorealistic". Those pictures are the perfect definition of a cartoonish style.

 

Thanks for joining my ignore list. Satangoss.

 

Why, I think Satangoss is right in his explanation.

 

Not going to debate that in detail.

 

I think you meant anyone ever claimed rF2 is graphically inferior is inferior.

hehehe

Great PiCS

 

Yea.. it's unfortunate that Hex has unwittingly shown the two faces of rF2 ..the dockyard track with the Macca looks great, but the vintage car/track is cartoony looking with over-bright colours. (I keep nudging the devs to overhaul these nice cars like they've done with the Formula Renault & the Clio)

One of the reasons is the track's own lighting.

All VLM's tracks look beautiful & they also light the cars themselves in a very good way. The colours of the cars running in them aren't ever over saturated, but if you then put the same cars in the vintage track that Hex has shown, they will look over saturated & poor..

Edit: pic removed

Woochoo's Longford is also fine example of good lighting, and feels3's Croft & Poznan

 

I'm glad I'm not the only one who can see the beauty in both the earlier and the newer content.

I'm done discussing 'taste', especially in regards to the visual aspects of this sim. Nothing good comes of it. Some people only look for 'mistakes', something to pick on, often without ever having created anything significant themselves. This in turn makes their arguments completely irrelevant to me. To each his own.

Life is indeed way too short to worry yourself with what others' subjective opinions are, when it comes to art.

 

What grabs he is how people have been saying it is the last few builds it is has improved.

Cods Wallop. lol

Ask tj what I told him build .dot when I was egging him to come across from pCARS.

For me AC and pCARS look very nice aesthetically, you know the models you buy already made in boxes ? , like those.

But rF2 modelling is more like Tamiya to me.

lol that probably makes no sense.

 

I think you mistook decent self-shadowing for bad smoothing Not that this bench is the peak of photorealism, but there's nothing wrong with it.

 

Yeah it does. I feel ya.

 

Lol, I think I'll not sleep tonight...