573 has much better graphics?

Discussion in 'Technical Archives' started by cosimo, Mar 15, 2014.

  1. cosimo

    cosimo Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2013
    Messages:
    827
    Likes Received:
    99
    I'm not sure if I'm dreaming or not, but it looks to me like 573 has much better graphics.
    I had this impression the first time I tried it, at Mores. I thought I wasn't very objective, and forgot about it.
    Today I tried another (non-ISI) track that I know very well, and I had the same impression of much better graphics (more realistic, I don't know how to put it), though this track had ghost trees (Transparent AA = 0 is only in my stable .ini, not in the unstable one).

    Did you guys do anything? :)
     
  2. Hedlund_90

    Hedlund_90 Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,684
    Likes Received:
    41
    Maybe I'm just imagining but I think there has been some improvements to the automatic hdr.

    About the Transparency AA, it doesn't work for me. Feels3's tracks still has the transparent trees. BUT other tracks looks absolutely beautiful. I always have it disabled but now I really noticed the difference. Trees looks much better.
     
  3. 88mphTim

    88mphTim racesimcentral.net

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    10,840
    Likes Received:
    314
    They were working on some things. Nothing in the notes, but that doesn't mean nothing changed. I'll try to find out.
     

Share This Page