Although you are right, none (bar the ones from freew67) of those use modelling for rF2 as a goal. This means certain things which will only be noise in the explanation and can be left out, and rF2 specific things, which there are, introduced.
I don't know what the target audience will be, although, it might be good to know who is attending and what their skill level is beforehand, so the agenda can reflect those people. Just a thought
If you focus on the rF specific things, well, to be honest, I do think a lot of people do not have the slightest clue where to begin when they want to build a track*. That the target platform happens to be rF2, seems to me a secondary goal
So right from the start, the initial starting point is something they need to decide. Is this course giving you a look into starting a track from scratch, or are you updating an existing one, are you doing a simple conversion, or are you importing an excisting track and do a complete overhaul to bring it into 2016 standards, hmm, so many options 
*This does depend heavily who your target audience is, so I think it would be wise to look into that. You don't to go over everybody's head in the first session, and not go completely basic when everybody is expecting more details either.
11 days to wait, hope I don't forget!
Just saw this one:
I don't know what the target audience will be, although, it might be good to know who is attending and what their skill level is beforehand, so the agenda can reflect those people. Just a thought
If you focus on the rF specific things, well, to be honest, I do think a lot of people do not have the slightest clue where to begin when they want to build a track*. That the target platform happens to be rF2, seems to me a secondary goal
*This does depend heavily who your target audience is, so I think it would be wise to look into that. You don't to go over everybody's head in the first session, and not go completely basic when everybody is expecting more details either.
11 days to wait, hope I don't forget!
Just saw this one:
I wouldn't automatically assume the participants have that basic knowledge. If you need this from people, I'd very much include that in the announcement/information post. I also think that most people who want to do some modding, but end up quitting or not doing it, are actually missing out on these basics in the first place. Hmm, a questionaire might not be so bad maybe.I wouldn't be too worried about that, because I can answer question here (on the forum) afterwards. Hangout will be published on youtube later, so you can watch it again and focus areas, which might go by on live broadcast.
If you have basic knowledge of modelling, materials and mapping, you will be fine.![]()
Last edited by a moderator: