As I thought, OC the CPU is not producing any benefit in rF2 although the results have been very surprising. Underclock the CPU to 1.4Ghz has not produced any change in the FPS. First impression was that it was due to being a replay, but tried with Resume Replay and FPS were the same. Also tested the change in PCI-E to Gen2 and if there was any doubt, I can confirm that it is a great bottleneck. Here the results. 7600k @4.8 Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 17642, 270974, 44, 85, 65,106 7600k @ 3.4 Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 17570, 270865, 44, 86, 64.866 7600k @ 2.2 Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 17639, 274562, 44, 82, 64.244 7600k @ 1.4 Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 17245, 270958, 42, 82, 63.645 7600k @ 4.8 PCI-E Gen2 (3.0 x8) Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 14373, 270834, 32, 73, 53.069 Sorry, 1080p Nuno.
GTX 1080 stock, i7-4770 @ 3.4 GHz Updated numbers for both laps (instead of only the first lap). Min Max Avg 27 63 46.697 -- 5760x1080 multiview on, Level 5 AA 28 69 51.538 -- 5760x1080 multiview on, no AA (multiview on = angled monitors) 45 83 65.589 -- 5760x1080 multiview off, Level 5 AA 50 92 73.910-- 5760x1080 multiview off, no AA (multiview off = one extra wide monitor, no angles) 63 156 111.332 -- 1920x1080, windowed, Level 5 AA 68 172 121.552 -- 1920x1080, windowed, no AA Hmm, I notice my minimums have dropped slightly... I wonder what is different.
Nuno - I do think you should add a chart for "multiview = on" since most people buy triple monitors with the intent of using multiview.
Added! Tomorrow I'll test myself too. I would like to see one Fury, Fury x or even the new Vegas to see the diference between AMD and Nvidia these days in GPU form the same segment. I believe the diference nowadays is much smaller than used to be in the first years of rF2.
