[POLL] : What are the 3 things you want to see the most and the fastest progress on rF2 ?

Discussion in 'Wish Lists' started by DrivingFast, Mar 27, 2019.

?

What are the 3 things you want to see the most and the fastest progress on rF2 ?

  1. Improve the "global realism": physics, driving in the rain/aquaplaning, gearbox very realistic, etc.

    85 vote(s)
    57.8%
  2. Systematic update official cars when necessary, especially in the field of Physics (also S397fromISI

    31 vote(s)
    21.1%
  3. Accelerate the creation of official cars, provided they remain of exceptional quality (realism).

    7 vote(s)
    4.8%
  4. Accelerate the creation of quality track (Zandvoort), and of exceptional quality (Nords, Sebring).

    19 vote(s)
    12.9%
  5. New competition system, improve the online experience.

    46 vote(s)
    31.3%
  6. Improve the offline experience + correct all the faults of the AI and significantly improve AI.

    60 vote(s)
    40.8%
  7. New UI + enhancement and added features.

    54 vote(s)
    36.7%
  8. Improve immersion elements : graphics, sounds, other immersion elements.

    39 vote(s)
    26.5%
  9. Performance of rF2 for all types of users + reduction of all loading times.

    38 vote(s)
    25.9%
  10. Other : please specify in your post.

    5 vote(s)
    3.4%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. DrivingFast

    DrivingFast Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    1,639
    Likes Received:
    1,080
    What are the 3 things you want to see the most and the fastest progress on rF2 ?

    3 answer only.
    Not display votes publicly
     
  2. LokiD

    LokiD Registered

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    1,282
    Likes Received:
    1,212
    other long standing bugs and issues fixed....we all know what they are.
     
  3. AMillward

    AMillward Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2017
    Messages:
    1,748
    Likes Received:
    1,690
    People go on about having realistic gearboxes, but how often do they drive something that needs an H shifter?
     
  4. DrivingFast

    DrivingFast Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    1,639
    Likes Received:
    1,080
    Using only S397, ISI, Kartsim and Slow Motion content :

    Almost half the time or at least 1/3. (about me)
     
  5. UsedMomo

    UsedMomo Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2017
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    138
    I don't use any manual boxes in rF2 because it doesn't have realistic simulation of them. I've spent close to ten hours just in the classic Pumas in AMS, and those haven't even been out that long.
     
  6. mantasisg

    mantasisg Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,128
    Likes Received:
    2,943
    Why we need such poll ?

    Voted for improving simulation, because improving online experience has to be in near release state by now.
     
  7. Adrianstealth

    Adrianstealth Registered

    Joined:
    May 28, 2012
    Messages:
    4,507
    Likes Received:
    1,008
    Improve realism was my choice
    Nice to see it most popular

    Aqua planing / gearbox etc would be very nice & will give rf2 anotyer step up above above any competition out there
     
  8. Will Mazeo

    Will Mazeo Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,223
    Likes Received:
    1,583
    Actual gearbox simulation doesn't mean manual only, tramission have effect on bumps if properly done for example, they also can receive damage from contact.

    Bad done poll anyway, some options should be together (cars, tracks = content) others should not be there because already coming (competition system + UI).
     
    LokiD likes this.
  9. Rui Santos

    Rui Santos Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    857
    Bug fixes and included in sounds - the crowd cheering like we had in rFactor1! I remember in some tracks on last lap the sound went louder, amazing experience and immersion factor!

     
  10. tlsmikey

    tlsmikey Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Messages:
    110
    Likes Received:
    135
    Improving graphics performance (FPS) in all conditions and quality of the graphics are the biggest factors for me at the moment. The ffb and physics are quite good on the recent content, but compared to the other sims the performance on triples is pretty poor at the moment.
     
    lagg likes this.
  11. LokiD

    LokiD Registered

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    1,282
    Likes Received:
    1,212
    It's not just the gearbox but puddle physics and rain ect
     
  12. DrivingFast

    DrivingFast Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    1,639
    Likes Received:
    1,080
    The first choice is not only on Physics. What I call "Global Realism" is all the things that S397 could do to improve driving and the driving context (beyond what is essentially immersion).

    In fact all the choices have a major importance for rF2, but it is very interesting (I think) to know the priorities of rF2 fans.
     
  13. bwana

    bwana Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,139
    Likes Received:
    1,040
    You use only auto in rf2 ?. Wow
     
  14. DrivingFast

    DrivingFast Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    1,639
    Likes Received:
    1,080
    In "global realism", maybe it would be interesting to improve the "RealRoad".
     
  15. Lazza

    Lazza Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    9,032
    Likes Received:
    4,153
    Auto or sequential, I would say. Probably more sequential.

    @DrivingFast Interesting that you comment on your own poll, but ok: what realroad improvement? I'm curious (I have my own hopes on where things go, though not sure I could easily list some that fall into 'realroad' directly)
     
  16. DrivingFast

    DrivingFast Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    1,639
    Likes Received:
    1,080
    Yes, that's why I used the word "maybe".

    Since this is an element of "global realism", I suppose it can be improved to be the most realistic.

    My most important wish and since rF1, is to have the most realistic simulation.

    I pray to God every night before going to bed that this is the ultimate priority of S397. (I'm joking)
     
  17. Bernd

    Bernd Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2013
    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    746
    @DrivingFast Just out of curiousity.
    You almost always talk about 100% of realism, that you want to have in every aspect.
    On the other side i have seen, that you, for example, ask modders of cars, if they can add versions of their car that have more power and torque, than they have in reality.
    For me, these 2 things contradict itselfs.
     
    Emery, StrawmanAndy and AMillward like this.
  18. DrivingFast

    DrivingFast Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2018
    Messages:
    1,639
    Likes Received:
    1,080
    It's true I agree.

    It was only an idea.
    but you are right.
     
  19. John R Denman

    John R Denman Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2018
    Messages:
    394
    Likes Received:
    454
    I only chose 2 as for my needs thats all that really applies.
    Updating S397 cars that are impacted by physics changes is a no-brainer.

    In the Other category, is correcting the tire thermodynamics physics which I doubt will ever happen. When cars are driven approaching the levels they're pushed to in real life the tires get way too hot and cooling cycles don't at all reflect the true physics. I have a hunch the processing it would take may take more CPU overhead than S397 wants to budget (or they don't have a good understanding of those physics) and even if they corrected it, that would impact the mods that have already been released.
     
  20. StrawmanAndy

    StrawmanAndy Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2014
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    307
    What's wrong with the AI? It's probably the best in sim racing. Is it track related because if the track has a bad aiw then it will ruin the ai.
     

Share This Page