Will Mazeo
Registered
If you drive online you probably got a skin in a server and now it shows like this
Oh, of course that's the issue! (bangs head against wall) I didn't even think of it due to no custom skins being available yet.If you drive online you probably got a skin in a server and now it shows like this
Making fun of the people who report problems is as embarrassing as the ones who misuse their words... if not worse.I think the appropriate response here is "What... can't you see it?"
Followed by "So you think that's ok then?"
Random blabla
Moreover, there's the alpha problem of transparent textures behind windows (look at the windscreen).See attached. Please forgive me if I forgot some of the issues this 3D model has.
Making fun of the people who report problems is as embarrassing as the ones who misuse their words... if not worse.![]()
looks like a bad mod … sry s397 I luv ya but really.. please whos the modder that did this car?OMG!
View attachment 20587
If the problem is on the front corner, then take a screen-shot of the front corner. If the item is layered behind something, then take a static screen-grab so the blur of the wheel, in this case, would not obscure the item you are looking for. In the previous post, D0nd33 pointed out specific items he felt were incorrect. Kudos to him. Not just complaining about that crap or this crap. You may, at some point, realize I am not defending the devs, but trying to help you get the most from your purchase.
Dont blame the artist, he most likely had a tight deadline, just look how they rush to deliver the content due to a competition, this time seems like they were in a hurry to deliver it before Christmas... and then they couldn't delay the Aston too much. since all others were already released.looks like a bad mod … sry s397 I luv ya but really.. please whos the modder that did this car?
To add too Lazza's post, there is a much better place to post issues and that is the Bug Reports sub-forum of the Technical and Support section.I wasn't making fun of anyone. Too often people post a picture with no description of what they're showing, and probably half the time with some random jibe ("this is a joke", or "wtf", or "is this real?", etc).
On several occasions I've been in discussions with people criticising something, or saying something is done wrong, and they show a picture and you say ok, what's wrong with it? And literally all you get back is a condescending "what, can't see you the problem?" "how is that right?" "if you can't see it, I don't know what to say" "it seems like you think everything they do is right".
If someone identifies something they see or think is wrong, as in actually identifies it, everyone's on the same page. Fewer arguments, quicker and clearer 'fix lists', and if the person is actually mistaken and needs to be corrected there's the opportunity to do it before things get out of hand.
I wasn't making fun of the particular person in this case, I hope my "the appropriate response here" was clearly a general jab at people who don't explain themselves properly and immediately get defensive. If it was taken personally I apologise.
That's what happens when the Dev use a low res spec map or a low res Defuse2 map texture.
Yesterday at 15:51
16 January 2019
Aston Martin Vantage GT3
v1.15
- Chassis texture update/fixes.
- Fixed texture issue on fuel intake cap.
- Fixed missing brake calipers.
- Fixed window sorting issue when using external cams with post process depth of field.
Thing is people 4 years ago wanted cars not just any cars gt cars and 90s f1 cars and the like.. We have them now and we applaud the studio. But we have lost quality and even maybe physics and ffb fidelity. Maybe rf2 should slow down a tad and finish and perfect whats started