Massimiliano it may not have been perfectly constructed, I don't create polls for a living. But, maybe 21 people thinking something was needed was enough to earn the courtesy of a considered response from the admin team. It didn't even get that. Not fantastic really. Not sure why you might say that. I am always happy to listen to the opposing view in a debate, and to respond to it, have done so numerous times. Does that mean I have to accept it as correct? I did listen, I simply don't agree with you. Nothing, I am not the best driver in AMA. That is not the correct test. The test should NOT be "is he dominating AMA" the test should be "can he run acceptably within ACA". If the overlap is as much as 6-7 drivers deep then why does only the top driver go up (and he hasn't anyway). The bottom line is that 6-7 drivers in AMA should and would be in ACA if there was a system that worked objectively. It would also save a lot of us the embarrassment of having to argue about where we should race. But there isn't one, so we debate about pace once again. Lets just get the bottom ten from ACA and the top 10 from AMA to have a couple of test races? Stop it David you are proposing change again! I too am happy to leave it alone here for now. I have said what I have said and I stand by it. I will close with saying: If I am wrong on all ten points I have raised, then I can only congratulate FSR on their organisation, they have nothing to gain from improving in any of these areas. . If on the other hand there are some areas for improvement, and somebody somewhere is open minded and progressive enough to deal with it, even better.