Released Laguna Seca

upload_2022-5-3_17-11-27.png


It sure is!

(yep, been waiting a day and a half to say that)
 
I know one great track talk vid about second half of the track. It should help many guys who has no clue why they are so slow at Laguna Seca. That track is different to others.


Such a technical track. I love it, coasting technique is more important than in any other race track. And every turn is very technical.

I wonder if we will have orange ribbon thing.

Donnington, Brands Hatch, Laguna Seca. Such a perfect bunch of tracks for online racing.
 
mantasisg said:
I know one great track talk vid about second half of the track. It should help many guys who has no clue why they are so slow at Laguna Seca. That track is different to others.


Such a technical track. I love it, coasting technique is more important than in any other race track. And every turn is very technical.

I wonder if we will have orange ribbon thing.

Donnington, Brands Hatch, Laguna Seca. Such a perfect bunch of tracks for online racing.
Click to expand...
Agree 100% on the list of tracks. Laguna looks really good... I'm looking forward to racing on these tracks. (Nice surprise to see multiple tracks being released at once. Great job.
 
Hi.
This has been one of my favorite tracks for decades lol, it's great to see an S397 version.
Looks really good, is this a scanned track? I didn't notice in the announcement.

Regards.
 
Laguna, Brands Hatch and Donintong Park have very good unofficial alternatives. Anyway is good to have an official version and I will buy all of them. But for me the actual need is a ranked competition system.

Even regarding this, having more official tracks is good to give more possibilities to S397 to organize such a system.

In my opinion RF2 have the higher quality standars in the market, but the lack of a more structured competititon system make him to loose the battle against lower quality rivals.
 
Nicolas Cortes said:
Laguna, Brands Hatch and Donintong Park have very good unofficial alternatives. Anyway is good to have an official version and I will buy all of them. But for me the actual need is a ranked competition system.

Even regarding this, having more official tracks is good to give more possibilities to S397 to organize such a system.

In my opinion RF2 have the higher quality standars in the market, but the lack of a more structured competititon system make him to loose the battle against lower quality rivals.
Click to expand...

sorry you can’t compare a laser scanned track with a third party one plus most of mod tracks are bad optimized with bad performances. Once I purchased these 3 circuits I will delete all three third party circuits from my hard drive.
 
@Paul Jeffrey
@Alex Sawczuk

I have an important question.
As a singleplayer, can I buy the tracks with a clear conscience as a single player?
In particular Laguna combined with the Indycar.
Will the AIW file work in the rain and dry?
I'm single player.
And is there also a fix for the AIW file Sebring + Indycar?
 
Last edited:
memoNo1 said:
@Paul Jeffrey
@Alex Sawczuk

I have an important question.
As a single player, can I buy the tracks with a clear conscience as a single player?
In particular Laguna combined with the Indycar.
Will the AIW file work in the rain and dry?
I'm single player.
And is there also a fix for the AIW file Sebring + Indycar?
Click to expand...
Maybe Sim less and Date more, then you won't be a single player!
 
GTClub_wajdi said:
sorry you can’t compare a laser scanned track with a third party one plus most of mod tracks are bad optimized with bad performances. Once I purchased these 3 circuits I will delete all three third party circuits from my hard drive.
Click to expand...
Yes, that I want to do too, the performance in VR is the point here. Some thrid P. tracks are bad in VR. The Studio tracks working fine
 
Nicolas Cortes said:
Laguna, Brands Hatch and Donintong Park have very good unofficial alternatives. Anyway is good to have an official version and I will buy all of them. But for me the actual need is a ranked competition system.

Even regarding this, having more official tracks is good to give more possibilities to S397 to organize such a system.

In my opinion RF2 have the higher quality standars in the market, but the lack of a more structured competititon system make him to loose the battle against lower quality rivals.
Click to expand...

Well, you should remember where rF2 came from and was like five years ago. Such things take a lot of time to develop. We are heading there, but we should be realistic and calibrate our expectations. Good things take time. Many, many, many improvements were implemented. Anyone how has doubts of rF2 should try to get a version from 2016 with content from there and compare to what we have today. Then think of were we could be in another six years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top