Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by TIG_green, Feb 21, 2013.
I see unstable build 483 is now being tested on the server
Where do you see that
In the matchmaker. There is a server called ISI 483 Unstable RC.
Does make me wonder though... can't anyone call their server ISI?
*Although when you click on it, it says versions do not match... but you could probably get that with an old build too...
Yep anyone can... something not available yet but a better matchmaker is in the works. The current unstable is kinda slow on the current matchmaker but the build has some new code preparing it self for some of the more advanced features to come.
And on that bombshell...
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk
Jeremy Miller @jeremymmiller 1h
@albim75 I really hope for unstable tomorrow AM
We all do....
ISI, you can do It! cmon!!!!!
Don't to too much tests men, it's called "unstable", we are here to help you, let us have some testing works please!
=> Just to say it don't have to be perfect. I know it's not easy as a feeling for you dev (I'm a dev) but hey, we know it's "unstable" one, no problem!
I do not agree yololo, as an admin we need something that doesn't crash our servers.
I would say instead :
Let them test and release a stable build even if it takes one or two more weeks. We need true optimization, players are fed up with bad releases!!!
Thanks & regards
If I was running in your league, I'd worry that an admin installs an unstable build to do league racing...
I never did, and I don't need : an unstable build + your stupid comment
Well, the subject here is an unstable build, and you talk about installing it for league racing. You should check a mirror before calling someone stupid... typical Parisian.
Good luck to your members in your well-run league.
Subject is Jeremy Miller tweets, not ONLY unstable build!
I don't like your attitude at all, very negative.
Even known stable builds crashed our servers in the past!
Looking forward to unstable build......sooner rather than later
Even a known stable isn't really stable
So don't download it when it come, and wait for the "stable" one?
It will be even more stable due to the previous "unstable" build released as some masochism volunteers like me will have tested it in parallel of the ISI test team (more people, possibly more problems found and resolved), so everybody should be happy? This is what I though so far...
Ok but please. Don't release it through autoupdate or on the website. Like a close beta only on the forum.
It will be a pain for admins to deal with stable/unstable versions.
Like on arma3 : dev&stable branches.
Please please please !!!
Separate names with a comma.