mantasisg
Registered
@philrob This is one that got me into modding, I absolutely must push it further. After this I must slow down may modding spree , I am doing way too much of it for two months now. But this is an apex of Jaguar, it is so unfortunate it didn't race, I think if it did race, Jaguar would have stayed on top.
@Emery Yes Sayer definitely was bold about low drag. Besides that obviously proper aero balance, control of total lift produced. Supposedly, he even insisted that Jaguar badge needs to be painted on, because anything else disturbed aero too much, well that is a little strange with all of the rivetting, but maybe rivets don't spoil flow too much. However the problem is that they absolutely would have had to do K version to be more competitive everywhere else besides tracks of long straights. The same Porsche was doing with 907,908 and 917. Real problem must have been the Engine displacement regulations.
And I think neither of those two had downforce
But they probably had nearly neutral amounts of lift. Of course they both had measures to pick more airflow up above car at front, and force air flow upwards at the rear. That Porsche in particular probably had excelent aerodynamics. I think Jaguar would have had detachable tail too. Maybe slight lowered front end, and more body work coverage of frontal tire area.
I wish Malcom Sayer worked for more decades on race cars. I think he would be known similarly like Norbert Singer is. There is no reason he wouldn't have been capable to change his mind from being all about low drag, to having some downwards force from aero effects.
I think while looking at cars, in the 80s cars were obviously already all about downforce, but they also still cared a great deal about top speeds as long as there was full Hunaudieres in use at LM.
@Emery Yes Sayer definitely was bold about low drag. Besides that obviously proper aero balance, control of total lift produced. Supposedly, he even insisted that Jaguar badge needs to be painted on, because anything else disturbed aero too much, well that is a little strange with all of the rivetting, but maybe rivets don't spoil flow too much. However the problem is that they absolutely would have had to do K version to be more competitive everywhere else besides tracks of long straights. The same Porsche was doing with 907,908 and 917. Real problem must have been the Engine displacement regulations.
And I think neither of those two had downforce
But they probably had nearly neutral amounts of lift. Of course they both had measures to pick more airflow up above car at front, and force air flow upwards at the rear. That Porsche in particular probably had excelent aerodynamics. I think Jaguar would have had detachable tail too. Maybe slight lowered front end, and more body work coverage of frontal tire area.
I wish Malcom Sayer worked for more decades on race cars. I think he would be known similarly like Norbert Singer is. There is no reason he wouldn't have been capable to change his mind from being all about low drag, to having some downwards force from aero effects.
I think while looking at cars, in the 80s cars were obviously already all about downforce, but they also still cared a great deal about top speeds as long as there was full Hunaudieres in use at LM.
Last edited: