Community Screenshots Thread (Unedited Screens Only)

DurgeDriven said:
lopl

----


If you look it is only the one shot ( from behind ) has jaggy lines I can see.
I think because of the distorted zoom and position I used.

Like if I preposition camera and zoom the same lines would be smooth.



Don't think you paying attention mate :)

Now look at that rear shot again what really sticks out in texture ? the brick building hey, almost too much. hint hint hehehe

Also notice the horizon how in that shot it does not look normally good hey, I think it is exactly what that light grey wire seems to suffer from in that pic too ( the 2 really ruined the shot for me )


But it is not woo's fault lol

Still ain't worked it out have ya ? loooo:pooool

How could I be running a 670 and you a 780 you saying and have worse jaggy power lines. ffff p

Bahahaha


They are 4K res, resized to 1920, so you can breath easy tj lol

That is why the wires are smoother mate and that hi res building sticks out that little tad more don't it !

With extreme zoom and focal point + 4K can highlight the nice stuff but can show up weakness in other areas.

In 4K you will see some big difference both good and bad in signage and other stuff at different tracks for example in many sims.
I assume because not all 2D/3D models been done in the same res or are not as good quality.

Give 4K a whirl mate I can still drive a okay lap with 7 ai , medium shadows 4xS 8xAA and no HDR

It really does show the true gfx potential of rF2, more so then any other sim I have run 4K........... and I have run em all :p


But that is just my opinion, what do I know.

Personally I like the last shot the most, cars are immaterial, shows off the grass and the painted posts ( ever noticed the bottoms being un-painted ? ) and overall ambiance of Longford. ;)

P.S. Even in the last shot tj notice how the road edge looks blurred but other things razor sharp.

razor sharp for fugly 60Hz No HDR I mean. lol
Click to expand...


Unedited Screens Only.
 
DurgeDriven said:
Get a life
Click to expand...

I have a life but I wonder how it is with you, when somebody discovers how you are manipulating you screens they get this "Get you a life or jikjik, Bahahaha, lolp."

To me you are Screens as Turtle says: "Downsampling is not editing but for sure can be considered as a post-processing to simulate a full FSAA." and not united screens.

You are BUSTED, do it feel good?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ari Antero said:
I wonder how it is with you, and when somebody discovers how you are manipulating you screens they get this.
Click to expand...


Well what I would expect someone to think Ari is if they get a 4K monitor it will look ? .......even better ? :confused:


After all you told me I have a blurry screen tearing 60Hz PC


You are off in another thread telling customers people get 14fps with Sli.


I think my post was a bit more uplifting.


Funny though I was driving a race ( those picks are realtime pause ) @4K at 50fps at the settings I posted above and with my specs.
It looked absolutely lovely as I said above the screens do not do incar justice.

My system is no faster then the guys with Sli says rF2 runs terrible and looks horrible and the next guy says it looks like a phone game.


I SAY OPEN YA EYES :rolleyes:
 
You infer my pics are manipulated and will trick people into thinking rF2 looks better.
Sorry correct me if I am wrong but that is what I read into it.


The big kicker Ari stuffs your story is those shots are No HDR and 4xS

You have told me before no HDR is terrible and in a seperate thread 4xS is horrible or words to those effect.

So how can I be conning anyone if no HDR according to Garp looks like crap.


:p
 
Ari Antero said:
To me you are Screens as Turtle says: "Downsampling is not editing but for sure can be considered as a post-processing to simulate a full FSAA." and not united screens.

You are BUSTED, do it feel good?
Click to expand...

I didn't say they are edited sorry. Unedited shot means pick your GRAB_X file from your rF2 screenshot folder and upload as it is, BUT at the time Durge is just posting a DSR version he can post in this thread. There is no editing (which means no offline manipulation inside the picture) but just a different way to get sort of Supersampling Antialiasing, by the GPU driver processing (downsampling). You can get this in realtime gameplay too, if your system is capable to manage the rescale algorithm (DSR). So, if those pictures are DSRs output, they're, technically speaking, unedited shots. :)
 
Okay from now on mate fair enough any 4K I put in edited screenshots ( I do a pretty good edit )

But I wont tell anyone which are 4K and which are 1920.

Would that be better ? :rolleyes: lol


Actually when I posted those shots it never dawned on me honest that people would take issue, I just wanted to show off Longford and the GTO makes me proud that rF2 is my sim. :o lool


I only put 4K in little fonts so tj would not see it before he read my hints, ie: what gave it away as 4K. hehehe ( if you actually read the post you quoted you will see )


tj liked them anyways. ........nahnah nahnah lol ;)


Speaking of edits to con people, what does Shift, AC and pCARS do with their videos , I see warning " These are in game shots " don't tell me they don't tart some of it up. ? Like I half blind and I can see it.

ISI's own videos always looks as in sim .............exactly.
 
DurgeDriven said:
Speaking of edits to con people, what does Shift, AC and pCARS do with their videos , I see warning " These are in game shots " don't tell me they don't tart some of it up. ? Like I half blind and I can see it.

ISI's own videos always looks as in sim .............exactly.
Click to expand...

ISI's own videos looks even worse than in game, which is quite an achievement.
 
I dunno about that.

I saw one of the first Historic videos of F2 and F3 at Monaco.

Very first build and the experience and look of the sim was exactly what I expected.

:rolleyes:
 
DurgeDriven said:
Well what I would expect someone to think Ari is if they get a 4K monitor it will look ? .......even better ? :confused:


After all you told me I have a blurry screen tearing 60Hz PC


You are off in another thread telling customers people get 14fps with Sli.


I think my post was a bit more uplifting.


Funny though I was driving a race ( those picks are realtime pause ) @4K at 50fps at the settings I posted above and with my specs.
It looked absolutely lovely as I said above the screens do not do incar justice.

My system is no faster then the guys with Sli says rF2 runs terrible and looks horrible and the next guy says it looks like a phone game.


I SAY OPEN YA EYES :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


You are spamming every Nvidia topic here in forums with you screens claiming that all is just fine with rFactor2 gfx, are those screens like you game experience or have you also done something with those screens?

I do not live in a DD`s dream world and when I am telling to you that SLI looks horrible, HDR, shadows etc can not bee used you better believe that. Link to 14 fps topic: http://isiforums.net/f/showthread.p...Now-Available!?p=326996&viewfull=1#post326996 and it is not coming from me.

Dream on baby dream on...............
 
You delusion mate. lol you got white line fever too many laps slow down ...hehehe ;)

When did I EVER say everything was fine with everything Ari.

lol what horsedung.

I have ALWAYS said all sims have there good and bad in graphics and other stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top