Community Screenshots Thread (Unedited Screens Only)
- Thread starter 88mphTim
- Start date
babu76
Registered
billyblaze
Registered
Had to do it
yeehaw!!!
DurgeDriven
Banned
WEEEeeeeeeeee p
argo0
Registered
Last edited by a moderator:
MaD_King
Registered
Track seems good, but there is no reflection on the cars due to missing parameters on the track I suppose?
Actually it seems to be a problem with my "grafted" URD Ferrari version from regular rF2 to DevMode. Other cars are showing REFMAP0 correctly.
DurgeDriven
Banned
rolandhaans
Registered
Hi DD, what track would that be? Looks awesome.
Sent from my XT1562 using Tapatalk
Bjørn
Registered
I didn't know you promoted questionable content
DurgeDriven
Banned
I didn't know you promoted questionable content
hehehe you got me lol p
I don't support splash dash conversions or work goes against clear and strict permissions.
The author has done other tracks with permission, some not, another he can't locate.
Tim wants to remove pic he will.
lol
To be honest it's nigh 10 years since the GTL/GTR conversions of the same rFactor track.
If no author has done a conversion for rF2 in 5 years and they look as good as this and look like they belong in rFactor2 I can't see the modder worrying myself.
Bjørn
Registered
No, no... I just love the two-tonguedness you showboat here 
I love it !
I love it !hehehe you got me lol p
I don't support splash dash conversions or work goes against clear and strict permissions.
The author has done other tracks with permission, some not, another he can't locate.
Tim wants to remove pic he will.
lol
To be honest it's nigh 10 years since the GTL/GTR conversions of the same rFactor track.
If no author has done a conversion for rF2 in 5 years and they look as good as this and look like they belong in rFactor2 I can't see the modder worrying myself.
DurgeDriven
Banned
No, no... I just love the two-tonguedness you showboat here
I don't get it ? lol
Would I stamp my feet if someone posted Jim's IOM or ORSM - FVR no permission....... you bet I will ! lool
Tell ISR ...........
http://www.internationalsimracing.com/forum/index.php?topic=3994.0
Bjørn
Registered
You don't get it?
I have seen you multiple times slam converters (I call them modders). Be it track modders or car modders, doesn't matter. You are one of the first to question their "integrity".
Righteous is the word that spring to my mind. And yet you seem to fall into these traps yourself... The McLaren M8H for instance... and now this? A Simbin track released in a paid-for expansion pack for Race07 called STCC The Game...
I am not the one to go tell ISR. I'd expect you to do so, however
I have never claimed to be a saint or slammed any modder that releases a track or a car. And people who do try to stay off of (and degrade) "questionable content" (and only race ISI F3's on ISI classic tracks) will have a very hard time because the mine field, that the content browser would be, will blow up occationally.
I have seen you multiple times slam converters (I call them modders). Be it track modders or car modders, doesn't matter. You are one of the first to question their "integrity".
Righteous is the word that spring to my mind. And yet you seem to fall into these traps yourself... The McLaren M8H for instance... and now this? A Simbin track released in a paid-for expansion pack for Race07 called STCC The Game...
I am not the one to go tell ISR. I'd expect you to do so, however
I have never claimed to be a saint or slammed any modder that releases a track or a car. And people who do try to stay off of (and degrade) "questionable content" (and only race ISI F3's on ISI classic tracks) will have a very hard time because the mine field, that the content browser would be, will blow up occationally.
I don't get it ? lol
Would I stamp my feet if someone posted Jim's IOM or ORSM - FVR no permission....... you bet I will ! lool
Tell ISR ...........
http://www.internationalsimracing.com/forum/index.php?topic=3994.0
DurgeDriven
Banned
McLaren, one in 5 years lol
Multiple times
Race07 !@! ffs !@! lol
A conversion of a conversion by a gone missing modder from a 8 year old expansion.
Ya kiddin!
That is totally different situation to any track I questioned, ie: 3rd Party permissions ?
Oh how many in 5 years huh ? IOM and a few aussie tracks from ORSM and FVR .....................whoop whoop lol
By your standards any track by any developer would be off limits. ffs lol
Multiple times
Race07 !@! ffs !@! lol
A conversion of a conversion by a gone missing modder from a 8 year old expansion.
Ya kiddin!
That is totally different situation to any track I questioned, ie: 3rd Party permissions ?
Oh how many in 5 years huh ? IOM and a few aussie tracks from ORSM and FVR .....................whoop whoop lol
By your standards any track by any developer would be off limits. ffs lol
Bjørn
Registered
One in five years? It's just the one I remember from the top of my head...
A conversion of a conversion you say? Does that wear off the origin and make it okay?
By my standards? Like I said I'm no saint.
It's more like your standards. Because you are the one lashing out. And yes, it is on multiple occations... Want me to dig a portion of it out for you?
lopl
A conversion of a conversion you say? Does that wear off the origin and make it okay?
By my standards? Like I said I'm no saint.
It's more like your standards. Because you are the one lashing out. And yes, it is on multiple occations... Want me to dig a portion of it out for you?
lopl
McLaren, one in 5 years lol
Multiple times
Race07 !@! ffs !@! lol
A conversion of a conversion by a gone missing modder from a 8 year old expansion.
Ya kiddin!
That is totally different situation to any track I questioned, ie: 3rd Party permissions ?
Oh how many in 5 years huh ? IOM and a few aussie tracks from ORSM and FVR .....................whoop whoop lol
By your standards any track by any developer would be off limits. ffs lol
DurgeDriven
Banned
Mate, I not lashing out, how ? lol
I posted a screenshot, all I meant to do.
We all have different views on many things, converters ethics are no less varied
I rather someone who acknowledges permission issues and puts work into the content rather then
someone acknowledges nothing and does a rough job.
Of late you notice more and more people on even as you say "questionable content" sites complaining about
poorer quality content for AC , AMS , rF2 and other rips.
A guy got bashed because a car he modded was going to be officially in the sim anyways....and the wheels are too big. LMAO
I suggested ISI to require mod slots and rfmod validation for their servers which would mean no rips at all.
On the same hand I do not like people take and use stuff they know says not to in the readme.
Hey, Simbin unofficially allowed conversions from sim to sim to gain followers for years.
Would be a bit hypocritical of them to wag on about a 8 year old circuit now, besides, do you hear them ?
I posted a screenshot, all I meant to do.
We all have different views on many things, converters ethics are no less varied
I rather someone who acknowledges permission issues and puts work into the content rather then
someone acknowledges nothing and does a rough job.
Of late you notice more and more people on even as you say "questionable content" sites complaining about
poorer quality content for AC , AMS , rF2 and other rips.
A guy got bashed because a car he modded was going to be officially in the sim anyways....and the wheels are too big. LMAO
I suggested ISI to require mod slots and rfmod validation for their servers which would mean no rips at all.
On the same hand I do not like people take and use stuff they know says not to in the readme.
Hey, Simbin unofficially allowed conversions from sim to sim to gain followers for years.
Would be a bit hypocritical of them to wag on about a 8 year old circuit now, besides, do you hear them ?
Last edited by a moderator: