I also wouldn't mind reading more detailed change logs.
There was a software update released, graphical changes, and we modified how mods are handled. As we said all along, we will try for backwards compatibility, but is is not guaranteed DURING TESTING.![]()
+1I also wouldn't mind reading more detailed change logs.
The FFB update frequency is high enough to take advantage of something like the Leo Bodnar FFB direct drive wheel. Unfortunately other wheels are not as god-like and rely on down-gearing or belts off the motors. Which is a weak point.
Why weak point?The FFB update frequency is high enough to take advantage of something like the Leo Bodnar FFB direct drive wheel. Unfortunately other wheels are not as god-like and rely on down-gearing or belts off the motors. Which is a weak point.
To get full picture, you should also test T500RS. Both are belt-driven, but T500RS has tooth belts, while CSW has V-belts.Tomorrow I receive the Fanatec Clubsport wheel for testing and review. I will know exactly how messy the rF2 ffb behaves on that belt drive wheel compared to my g27.
Probably not at this time. Just the components required for that level of performance tend to cost more than the top of the range consumer wheels of today.Is this the way to go? Any chance to have this in a production wheel with affordable cost?
Btw
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=...Computer%20Simulators%20Does%20Not%20Work.pdf
impressive essay on ffb.
I'm just making simple statements of fact as it relates to me, but there must be 1000's of G27 owners who don't relish any software breaking their wheel.
some of the comments from fanboys defies belief....and if it was down to you, most software would be in a worse state as you worship developers and can't stand any criticism.
To me the grip levels with the ISI Formula (2011) Masters is way off.
I think when the track has no rubber and its dry and warm the grip should be 60% more than it is now for that car
When the track is rubberd in I think the grip should be about 5% more than it is now.
Why do I need to imagine something like that? FFB is configurable in rF2, is it not?Just imagine that rF2 has set FOV set to 20, hardcoded, not settable, forcing you to buy some 180* display.