Unofficial NEWS Thread

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by johnsclander, Dec 13, 2018.

  1. Louis

    Louis Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,379
    Likes Received:
    840
    I think AMS also
     
    mantasisg likes this.
  2. bhendrik

    bhendrik Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2014
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    79
    6DFD8BB0-387F-45BC-A874-035A196EB7B8.png . PXi ???
     
  3. RaceNut

    RaceNut Registered

    Joined:
    May 21, 2013
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    539
    iRacing, rF2 and AMS; perhaps the titles with the most "Simulation :D Value" available today but, iRacing has a few standout features that need to be included in rF2. Online racing system aside, the drive-train model is really impressive in motion and the audio is also pretty advanced with another update in the works. Of course, these are not primary concerns but, I do hope they are on the long-list of updates still to come.
     
  4. mantasisg

    mantasisg Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,926
    Likes Received:
    3,876
  5. Flaux

    Flaux Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,012
    Likes Received:
    422
    You did it...haha
     
    Alex72 and Rui Santos like this.
  6. Rui Santos

    Rui Santos Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,081
    Likes Received:
    1,206
    Alex72 likes this.
  7. mantasisg

    mantasisg Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,926
    Likes Received:
    3,876
    I'm sorry :D

    I don't think it was necessary, but I suspect Kunos fans has done that already judging by gap shrinking at one specific time (but I don't know if it is true). So just for fun :D

    Anyway I'm very happy that work of great simulators developers got reflected in the votes. Kunos, Reiza, Studio 397, they are all winners. I suppose iRacing miss good amount of votes there, because iR fans does not come to RD as much as fans of other titles.
     
    Alex72 and Rui Santos like this.
  8. Daniele Vidimari

    Daniele Vidimari Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    593
  9. fab06

    fab06 Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2015
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    378
    [​IMG]

    they' re some little difference compare to the real :rolleyes:
     
    filippu and Javi288 like this.
  10. Alex72

    Alex72 Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,317
    Likes Received:
    992
  11. filippu

    filippu Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    139
    Congratulations S397.
    That's a bad bad car. It takes 2 seconds of comparison with the real life car to notice many issues with the model, and once again, the materials look awful.
    Another rushed car that fanboys will enjoy.
     
    datasting likes this.
  12. Chris Lesperance

    Chris Lesperance Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,295
    Likes Received:
    2,061
    I was looking for a while for this post, and now I finally found it to comment on it. PXi wasn't something completely new. I think it was mentioned by URD as something they were looking at. There was this preview from when the Detroit was initially previewed. Nothing has been seen of this car since (May 2018). To my ability, it looks like the Dallara LMP2 which would be the base of the Caddy.

    https://twitter.com/UnitedRDesign/status/992076343092432897

    https://forum.studio-397.com/index....rder-with-beta-access-available.48293/page-76
     
    bhendrik likes this.
  13. datasting

    datasting Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    4,283
    looks like a Matchbox car...total Fail!!!
     
  14. fab06

    fab06 Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2015
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    378
    [​IMG]
    is it some Runflat tires on the screen ?
     
  15. Daniele Vidimari

    Daniele Vidimari Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    593
    LOL, do you really think that at the Aston Martin HQ they don't know how their car is? Do you really think that S397 failed to put the fuel filler in the wrong side? Do you really think that AM's chiefs didn't noticed a different front bumper if it's wrong? Do you even know that this car has not raced yet, the real picture are from a early preview and the real car is still in development?



    Damn, here they used a fake Vantage GT3... :rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2019
    F1Aussie, Nitrometh, Alex72 and 5 others like this.
  16. mantasisg

    mantasisg Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,926
    Likes Received:
    3,876
    Without being very picky model looks pretty good to me, except rimblur and lowpoly headlight lines, thats not passing.
     
  17. filippu

    filippu Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    139
    What the f are you even talking about ?
    I was talking about the bad modelling such as this
    [​IMG]
     
  18. Daniele Vidimari

    Daniele Vidimari Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    593
    So you need to compare it to the real one to notice a squared headlight mask? Okay :)
     
  19. Lazza

    Lazza Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,346
    Likes Received:
    6,572
    You literally said "It takes 2 seconds of comparison with the real life ".

    People are actually more open to constructive criticism than you might believe. It's the rushed, cynical, mindless bashing that gets on people's nerves.
     
  20. davehenrie

    davehenrie Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2016
    Messages:
    7,454
    Likes Received:
    4,369
    Several people have posted screen shots of the 'bad' modeling. To their trained eyes, certain issues jump out clearly to them. But when these screenshots are posted and the fellow writes....JUST LOOK AT IT!!!! Well many of us just don't know what we are supposed to see. To users who see a problem, It would help present your case if you circled or highlighted the issue. You might clearly see the low polys around the headlight while I'm looking for how many filaments are visible in the head light.
    It would make these conversations easier for all to understand if we are given a target. Just posting the model is rotten doesn't help users not familiar with 3d modeling. Mentioning smoothing as if we all know it's purpose can also inhibit conversation. I know experienced 3d modelers understand these complaints, but the vast number of readers here are probably less than literate on the peculiarities of a sharp edge, a missing gmt or all the other voodoo that makes up the shape of a car.
     
    Alex72, pkelly, Emery and 6 others like this.

Share This Page