I disagree with your opinion, for me Rf2 ffb>Gtr2>rfactor THe track (the isi's one at least) have far more road detail (not really graphic but they have more different surface all that) + the tyre model make the feeling very good. Now i still prefer the feeling of rfactor1 with leoffb and real feel, but then again as a retail ffb; rf2 one is great!
Whatever, dude...Super Metroid is the best game of all time, actually. Far more responsive controls. Great graphics. Gameplay that spawned all sorts of imitators. So, clearly, you don't know what you're talking about...
Default GTR2 cars, ALL of them, have absurd understeer, as somebody already pointed here. Its almost impossible to set them even neutral, let alone for oversteer. I tried to like that game, tried really hard (maybe because it has that fantastic UI, if any that is area where rF2 should follow), but somehow it all feels simplified, not arcade but not so much sim either. Uninstalled it long time ago. But why do we all bother with responding, he's either super high or troll. I guess the former, since its friday and holidays are about to start!
Lets not confuse drivable arcade physics for simulated physics just because you can't keep the ass end behind you. I just came over from iRacing, so maybe I'm just overwhelmed with a tire that has some grip, but I can't hardly put the game down. Only complaint I have so far is the way only certain cars can run on certain tracks, and maybe graphics. Otherwise I think it's scary the potential this game has.
BYE......... see you but you will be back with diff attitude when full release is out... to actually compare the game then to a game not a BETA..........DONT FORGET TO GET A REFUND ON YOUR WAY OUT
IS THIS GUY HIGH??????????? GTR2 is based on the ISI engine. Its basically an rfactor mod. Not only that but it isnt even based on the latest version of the rf1 engine. Rfactor 1 technically in regards to physics engine, graphics engine etc etc is superior to GTR2 as again, GTR2 is based on the rf1 engine BUT not the very latest rf1 engine. On top of all that, if you were reading the forums in 2007 and 2008 when GTR2 was pretty new there was tons of proof that GTR2 was dumbed down and simplified from what it could have been and from what the rf1 physics engine is/was capable of. On top of all that, to say its better than RF2 (let alone rf1), your HIGH ON SOMETHING.
GTR2 = ISI So let's do this another way- ISI = GTR2 X ISI = ISI... Or like this Sim(ISI)bin that makes more sense lol Do you get it LOL
Apparently the guy was exaggerating when opened the thread, but I think ISI should pay some attention for some of his statements. RF2 is better, but not that better I could expect from 5 years of development. I would say the same regarding some of excellent RF1 Mods, they still please me more than RF2. And, yeah, GTR2 is great. "GTR2 feels like a car. I can feel the back end when it moves. It feels alive. rF2 feels like software. I have little idea what the car's doing." Except for 370Z, I couldn't explain better. That's I feel too. In addition, don't pay attention to those stupid "lolers", worse than reproach other opinions is try to mock of them.
Now now guys i think he's right......... RIGHT OUT OF HIS MIND that is..... Gary guessing thats your first post...? why start it off that way?
I think some folk just expected more when they came to rF2, it is still in a very pre release state and is plagued with problems. That is the nature of beta. Because folk have paid they expect more... erroneous but inevitable. I too expected things to be a little further along but along with most of the rest of us hope things will get better with the next release.
Jajajajajaja. This was funny. It is always good a humorous post in the forums. Thanks for your great sense of humor. Because .... I guess .... is a joke.
