I have a question, could you explain to me if rfactor 2 is still in beta or is it already a definitive game? Sorry for my english translated by google translator
It's not in beta, but not in a definitive state either, because it's intended to be in a constant development.
True and true... but to give a bit more intel to new guys. Right now, since the new UI and competition system release... you can pretty much consider the game joggling somewhere between pre-alpha and beta... depending on the release. Having said that, I'm sure it will get better... so don't be too afraid to stick around... the game is well worth it despite many broken aspects.
My question was in sarcastic mode, since you cannot put paid content in a beta version, and you cannot sell the beta version game for the price that is sold, I mean that, it is not beta version but they are screwing us as if it were a beta. Because if the game is in beta version ... why do you charge for additional content?
Dev will not answer that question. At the very least, because it's not a beta, beta - only UI. But apparently I'm a pervert - I like to pay for beta content. I'm not happy with a lot of things either, but someone wrote on RD about how the RF2 has progressed a lot when S397 bought it. To be fair, I agree - it does get better every time. All the hate is because of the constant bugs in every patch, but overall RF2 is a very good sim.
Nothing Beta about the driving itself - in fact its second to none. The rest of the software is honestly just a mess that the ppl who enjoy the driving has learned to live with.
I have no hatred of the game, I just do not see normal that I have to pay content for an unfinished game, if it is a beta, why do I have to pay? isn't a beta supposed to be for bug testing? I also enjoy rfactor 2
You don't HAVE to pay, unless your doctor prescribed to play RF2, if this case, your health is surely worth the price. More seriously, STEAM is literally FULL of games you pay in beta, and some even before they are released (never heard of Cyberpunk?). Is just how computer game world is in the 21° century.
if it were beta they wouldn't have to get paid content, I don't know if you understand this. when a game is to test the only paid content would have to be the base game. Do you understand? Here we are playing testers of the game and on top of it paying for content, do you understand? I have no problem paying € or $ 15 to buy the base game to test it and report bugs, I no longer see normal to pay € or $ 80 for content that contains bugs, do you understand now? hence my complaints. And sorry for my English but I use google translator, sorry
do not compare a game made 2 months ago with one made several years ago, and what's more, cyberpunk has several bugs that have already been fixed
Again, you have the choice of either accepting that RF2 has bugs or ignoring this game. In that case your problem will be solved. There are specifics about selling the game and I understand you are not happy with them. There is no way out here, other than not to use a product that you feel is not worth your money.
[QUOTE = "R.Noctua, post: 1057746, member: 53785"] De nuevo, tienes la opción de aceptar que RF2 tiene errores o ignorar este juego. En ese caso, su problema se resolverá. [/ QUOTE] Pagué el juego pensando que todo iba bien, demasiado tarde para dar marcha atrás.